State Ex Rel. Bole v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Bole v. District Court

294 P. 1121, 87 Mont. 613, 1930 Mont. LEXIS 114

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 28, 1930

DocketNo. 6,701.

StatusPublished

This text of 294 P. 1121 (State Ex Rel. Bole v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Bole v. District Court, 294 P. 1121, 87 Mont. 613, 1930 Mont. LEXIS 114 (Mo. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— The court in this cause having issued an alternative writ of mandate directed to the respondents commanding them to rule on the application of relators for a writ of mandate against the clerk of the District Court of Gallatin county in the matter above referred to, or to show cause on May 28, 1930, why a ruling thereon should not be made, and it appearing to the court that on the twenty-first day of May, 1930, the respondents made return showing that the district court had ruled upon said application, in consequence of which ruling the function of the alternative writ of mandate, issued as aforesaid, has been performed, it is ordered that relators’ petition to this court be denied, and the proceeding is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— The court in this cause having issued an alternative writ of mandate directed to the respondents commanding them to rule on the application of relators for a writ of mandate against the clerk of the District Court of Gallatin county in the matter above referred to, or to show cause on May 28, 1930, why a ruling thereon should not be made, and it appearing to the court that on the twenty-first day of May, 1930, the respondents made return showing that the district court had ruled upon said application, in consequence of which ruling the function of the alternative writ of mandate, issued as aforesaid, has been performed, it is ordered that relators’ petition to this court be denied, and the proceeding is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 P. 1121, 87 Mont. 613, 1930 Mont. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bole-v-district-court-mont-1930.