State ex rel. Boeckman v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Boeckman v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections

654 N.E.2d 983, 73 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 1999

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 1995·No. 95-1789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hawkins v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 4, 57 O.O.2d 63, 274 N.E.2d 563, the writ of mandamus be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Douglas, Acting C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hawkins v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 4, 57 O.O.2d 63, 274 N.E.2d 563, the writ of mandamus be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Douglas, Acting C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

State ex rel. Boeckman v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections, 654 N.E.2d 983, 73 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 1999 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

654 N.E.2d 983 (State ex rel. Boeckman v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related