State ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen
48 N.J. Eq. 294
Opinion
This court agrees with his Honor, the vice-chancellor, that the complainant has failed to establish by his testimony the existence of a nuisance, and the decree is consequently affirmed.
The other matters discussed in the opinion in the court of chancery have not been considered by this court.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiep-Justice, Depue, Diícon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen, 48 N.J. Eq. 294 (N.J. 1891).
48 N.J. Eq. 294 (State ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Paterson Tallow Company
65 A.2d 112 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
State v. Jennings
18 A.2d 62 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
State v. Mundet Cork Corp.
8 A.2d 105 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)