State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Qvale

124 N.W. 22, 109 Minn. 530, 1910 Minn. LEXIS 608
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 14, 1910·No. Nos. 16,502—(238)·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application, heard upon an order to show cause, for a peremptory .writ of mandamus directing the respondent, as judge of the district court of the county of Meeker, to resettle and allow the ease mentioned in the moving papers herein and to certify the documents and papers considered by him on the hearing in the district court. Upon a consideration of the moving papers, respondent’s return, and relator’s reply, we are .of the opinion that the relator was not as a matter of right entitled to have its motion to resettle and certify the case granted by the respondent, and that, the denial of the motion was not an abuse of judicial discretion. State v. Quinn, 107 Minn. 503, 120 N. W. 1088.

Order to show cause discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Qvale, 124 N.W. 22, 109 Minn. 530, 1910 Minn. LEXIS 608 (Mich. 1910).

124 N.W. 22 (State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Qvale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. McDougall v. Quinn
120 N.W. 1088 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)