State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Qvale
This text of 124 N.W. 22 (State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Qvale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application, heard upon an order to show cause, for a peremptory .writ of mandamus directing the respondent, as judge of the district court of the county of Meeker, to resettle and allow the ease mentioned in the moving papers herein and to certify the documents and papers considered by him on the hearing in the district court. Upon a consideration of the moving papers, respondent’s return, and relator’s reply, we are .of the opinion that the relator was not as a matter of right entitled to have its motion to resettle and certify the case granted by the respondent, and that, the denial of the motion was not an abuse of judicial discretion. State v. Quinn, 107 Minn. 503, 120 N. W. 1088.
Order to show cause discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 N.W. 22, 109 Minn. 530, 1910 Minn. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-board-of-county-commissioners-v-qvale-minn-1910.