STATE EX REL. BOARD ETC. v. Stucker

111 N.E.2d 714, 232 Ind. 76, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 179
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedApril 20, 1953
Docket28,957
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 111 N.E.2d 714 (STATE EX REL. BOARD ETC. v. Stucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STATE EX REL. BOARD ETC. v. Stucker, 111 N.E.2d 714, 232 Ind. 76, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 179 (Ind. 1953).

Opinion

232 Ind. 76 (1953)
111 N.E.2d 714

STATE OF INDIANA, EX REL. BOARD OF MEDICAL REGISTRATION AND EXAMINATION
v.
STUCKER.

No. 28,957.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Filed April 20, 1953.

J. Emmett McManamon, Attorney General, Thomas L. Webber and Robert C. Walsman, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellant.

EMMERT, C.J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a temporary injunction sought by relator to prohibit appellee from practicing medicine without a license. The assignment of error here that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff a temporary injunction is in proper form. State ex rel. Board, etc. v. Hayes (1950), 228 Ind. 286, 288, 91 N.E.2d 913.

The appellee has failed to file an answer brief as required by Rule 2-15. If the appellant's brief makes *77 a prima facie showing of reversible error, we may reverse the order appealed from. Reed, Adm. v. Brown (1939), 215 Ind. 417, 420, 19 N.E.2d 1015; State v. Rousseau (1936), 209 Ind. 458, 199 N.E. 587; Finerty, Auditor v. Bryan (1938), 214 Ind. 570, 16 N.E.2d 882.

Since appellee has not controverted appellant's original brief, we are not required to detail all the evidence received by the trial court on the hearing before it denied a temporary injunction, but it is sufficient to note that the uncontroverted evidence disclosed that the appellee was practicing medicine without a license. In such case it was the duty of the trial court to issue the temporary injunction. State ex rel. Board, etc. v. Hayes (1950), 228 Ind. 286, 91 N.E.2d 913, supra; State ex rel. Board, etc. v. Henry (1951), 229 Ind. 219, 97 N.E.2d 487; State ex rel. Board, etc. v. Frasure (1951), 229 Ind. 315, 98 N.E.2d 365.

The interlocutory order denying a temporary injunction is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to grant the temporary injunction.

Flanagan, J., not participating.

NOTE. — Reported in 111 N.E.2d 714.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Riordan
2012 WI 125 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2012)
Cashman v. McKee
201 N.E.2d 498 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1964)
Board of Commissioners v. Peyton
129 N.E.2d 372 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)
Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance v. Ewen
126 N.E.2d 776 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)
Miller v. State
125 N.E.2d 177 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)
BROWN, ADMR. ETC. v. Montgomery
125 N.E.2d 37 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)
Consolidated Holding, Inc. v. ANWEILER
122 N.E.2d 905 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 N.E.2d 714, 232 Ind. 76, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-board-etc-v-stucker-ind-1953.