State ex rel. Blueford v. State

217 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 1459521, 2017 La. LEXIS 842
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 24, 2017·No. No. 17-KH-0356·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

|;WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted his right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court’s ruling deny-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Blueford v. State, 217 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 1459521, 2017 La. LEXIS 842 (La. 2017).

217 So. 3d 329 (State ex rel. Blueford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finality of determination
28 U.S.C. § 2244