State Ex Rel. Blount v. Simmons

23 S.E. 923, 118 N.C. 9
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

This is an action by the State, on relation of the Solicitor of the district, to vacate an oyster-bed entry, under the Act of 1893, ch. 287, sec. 4, and upon the hearing his Honor being of opinion, on the authority of State v. Spencer, 114 N. C., 770, that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, the plaintiff submitted to a non-suit, and, on motion of the Solicitor, judgment was entered against the County of Pamlico for the costs of the action, said county not being then a party to the action, but'was allowed to become a party for the purpose of an appeal. The plaintiff assigns no reason or authority why the county should be taxed with the costs, and we •can see none. The defendant refers to The Code, sections *11 536 and 537, and Bunting v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 633, in its behalf.

Judgment Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Blount v. Simmons, 23 S.E. 923, 118 N.C. 9 (N.C. 1896).

23 S.E. 923 (State Ex Rel. Blount v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Summerlin v. . Morrisey
84 S.E. 689 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Garner v. . Worth
29 S.E. 364 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
State v. . Horne
26 S.E. 36 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
State Ex Rel. Blount v. Simmons
25 S.E. 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)