State ex rel. Bloker v. Gabel

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Bloker v. Gabel

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 643

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1925

DocketNo. 19364; No. 19365

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 643 (State ex rel. Bloker v. Gabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bloker v. Gabel, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 643 (Ohio 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

[644]*644Petitions for nominations of candidates for members of the county board of education under favor of section 4728-1, General Code, must comply with the pertinent provisions of Chapter 7 of Title XIV relating to nomination of candidates, and a failure to comply with Sections 5000, 5001 and 5003 of the General Code renders such petitions invalid and the deputy state supervisors of elections may properly refuse to print upon the ballots the names of persons thus sought to be nominated.

Writ denied.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARSHALL, C. J.

[644]*644Petitions for nominations of candidates for members of the county board of education under favor of section 4728-1, General Code, must comply with the pertinent provisions of Chapter 7 of Title XIV relating to nomination of candidates, and a failure to comply with Sections 5000, 5001 and 5003 of the General Code renders such petitions invalid and the deputy state supervisors of elections may properly refuse to print upon the ballots the names of persons thus sought to be nominated.

Writ denied.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bloker-v-gabel-ohio-1925.