State Ex Rel. Blodgett v. Batcheller

19 A. 1090, 66 N.H. 145

• Court: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
• Decided: December 5, 1889
• Status: Published

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The petition is defective. It is not alleged that the defendants maintain the nuisance, — that they use the building for the illegal sale, or keeping for sale, of spirituous liquors. The building may be occupied by the defendants as a drug store, savings-bank, and post-office, and by other persons for other purposes. It is consistent with the allegations of the petition that the liquors are kept for sale and sold in the building by other occupants and not by the defendants. It is not the building, but the illegal use of it, that is the nuisance. When such use of it ceases, the nuisance is abated. Brown v. Perkins, 12 Gray 89, 102. The process of the court goes against the persons by whose unlawful acts the nuisance is created. The petition must show with reasonable certainty who those persons are, and they must be made parties to the proceeding.

This is a civil action (Rancour's Petition, post, p. 172), and the petition may be amended.

Demurrer sustained.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.