State Ex Rel. Blanpied v. Currier

19 A. 1000, 66 N.H. 622
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1889·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Petition, of twenty legal voters for the abatement of a liquor nuisance. The defendant demanded, and it was held, that he might have a trial by jury upon the question whether he used the building described in the petition for the purposes alleged. State v. Saunders, 66 N. H. 39, 89, 90.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Blanpied v. Currier, 19 A. 1000, 66 N.H. 622 (N.H. 1889).

19 A. 1000 (State Ex Rel. Blanpied v. Currier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chessman v. Hale
68 L.R.A. 410 (Montana Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Sunapee Dam Co.
55 A. 899 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1903)
State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Piper
47 A. 703 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)