State ex rel. Blanks v. Walker

36 So. 482, 112 La. 429, 1904 La. LEXIS 411
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 28, 1904
DocketNo. 15,169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 So. 482 (State ex rel. Blanks v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Blanks v. Walker, 36 So. 482, 112 La. 429, 1904 La. LEXIS 411 (La. 1904).

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

The defendant magistrate, whose jurisdiction is limited to $100, maintained his jurisdiction of a third opposition wherein an amount exceeding $100 was asked to be paid by preference out of the proceeds of the sale of property under seizure in his court, and the plaintiff in execution, whose plea to the jurisdiction ratione materise was thus overruled, has applied to this court for writs of certiorari and prohibition to procure the review of the ruling.

He has mistaken his remedy. It was to appeal to the district court; or, if a writ of prohibition was necessary, to sue it out in that court. State ex rel. Hirsch v. Judge, 39 La. Ann. 98, 1 South. 281.

Application dismissed, at the cost of applicant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Lambert
2 Pelt. 606 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 So. 482, 112 La. 429, 1904 La. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-blanks-v-walker-la-1904.