State ex rel. Blair v. Robeson
This text of 10 Ind. 379 (State ex rel. Blair v. Robeson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit upon the official bond of a justice of the peace, against him and his sureties. The breach assigned was the failure to pay over money collected.
The defense set up in the answer was, that the justice collected the money named in the complaint “ as the agent 0f the said James Blair, relator in the suit, and not by color of his office as justice,” &e. Issue upon this defense. Trial by the Court, and judgment for the defendants.
The case turns entirely upon the evidence. See The State v. Carter, 6 Ind. R. 37.
In such cases, if the evidence tends in any degree to support the judgment, the Supreme Court rarely interferes. We see nothing that will justify such interference in this case.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ind. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-blair-v-robeson-ind-1858.