State ex rel. Blaine v. Fairchild

180 N.W. 343, 173 Wis. 411, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 297
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 1920
StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.W. 343 (State ex rel. Blaine v. Fairchild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Blaine v. Fairchild, 180 N.W. 343, 173 Wis. 411, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 297 (Wis. 1920).

Opinion

Vinje, J.

Mandamus sued out of this court to restrain the circuit court and parties in the case of City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company from carrying into effect the judgment entered therein, and especially that part of it requiring passengers from outside of the city limits but within the single-fare zone, as established by the railroad commission, or passengers from the city going to some point in the single-fare zone outside the city, to pay an additional fare at the city limits. In view of the decision herewith rendered in the case of City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co., ante, p. 400, 180 N. W. 339, the petition is held to contain all the essential facts necessary to state a cause of action, and the city’s motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus is denied.

By the Court. — Motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
180 N.W. 339 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 N.W. 343, 173 Wis. 411, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-blaine-v-fairchild-wis-1920.