State ex rel. Blackburn v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Blackburn v. Henderson

257 So. 2d 433, 260 La. 858, 1972 La. LEXIS 5695

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 21, 1972

DocketNo. 52102

StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 2d 433 (State ex rel. Blackburn v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Blackburn v. Henderson, 257 So. 2d 433, 260 La. 858, 1972 La. LEXIS 5695 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: James Blackburn applying for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari.

[859]*859Writ denied. Based upon the affidavit of trial counsel of the relator filed in this court, we find no merit to the complaint that the relator was not informed of his right to appeal. The allegations are without merit.

BARHAM, J., does not concur.

See writ denied in State ex rel. Brownfield v. Henderson, 260 La. 445, 256 So.2d 437.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: James Blackburn applying for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari.

[859]*859Writ denied. Based upon the affidavit of trial counsel of the relator filed in this court, we find no merit to the complaint that the relator was not informed of his right to appeal. The allegations are without merit.

BARHAM, J., does not concur.

See writ denied in State ex rel. Brownfield v. Henderson, 260 La. 445, 256 So.2d 437.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 So. 2d 433, 260 La. 858, 1972 La. LEXIS 5695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-blackburn-v-henderson-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack