State ex rel. Black v. Board of Education

13 Ohio C.C. 603
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ohio C.C. 603 (State ex rel. Black v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Black v. Board of Education, 13 Ohio C.C. 603 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Smith, J.

We held that an alternative writ of mandamus should not be allowed in this case, for the reason that, by the advertisement made for bids, the right was reserved to the board “to reject any and all bids, ” and that in fact it did reject the bid of the relator, and he has no right to the contract. If an advertisement was necessary, the statute, section 3988, gives the board such right to reject. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose. In this the case differs from those decided in 19 Ohio St., 97, and 81 Ohio St., 415, in which the statutes under which the proceedings were had required the contract to be made with the lowest bidder. Writ refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ohio C.C. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-black-v-board-of-education-ohiocirct-1895.