State ex rel. Bisseberg v. Olsen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State ex rel. Bisseberg v. Olsen

144 N.W. 755, 124 Minn. 537, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 566

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 9, 1914

DocketNo. 18,591

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 N.W. 755 (State ex rel. Bisseberg v. Olsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bisseberg v. Olsen, 144 N.W. 755, 124 Minn. 537, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 566 (Mich. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Order to show cause why the trial court should not allow and sign a settled case after the expiration of the time fixed therefor by a stay of proceedings. The court had the power to grant the relief, but the application was addressed to its sound discretion. The facts presented to this court will not justify the conclusion that the court abused its discretion in denying the relief, and the order to show cause is therefore discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

Order to show cause why the trial court should not allow and sign a settled case after the expiration of the time fixed therefor by a stay of proceedings. The court had the power to grant the relief, but the application was addressed to its sound discretion. The facts presented to this court will not justify the conclusion that the court abused its discretion in denying the relief, and the order to show cause is therefore discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 N.W. 755, 124 Minn. 537, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bisseberg-v-olsen-minn-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack