State ex rel. Birtha v. State

824 So. 2d 1179, 2002 La. LEXIS 2615, 2002 WL 31081821
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 13, 2002·No. No. 2001-KH-1011·Published

Opinion

In re Birtha, William; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 97-6381; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 01-KH-170.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. Because the face of the pleadings, State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), 816 So.2d 289, shows that relator’s convictions of armed robbery of one victim and attempted first degree felony murder of that same victim violate double jeopardy principles, United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 575-76, 109 S.Ct. 757, 765, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989); State ex rel. Adams v. Butler, 558 So.2d 552, 553-54 (La.1990), the district court is ordered to vacate “the less severely punishable (and less severely punished)” attempted first degree murder conviction and sentence. State ex rel. Boyd v. State, 98-0378 (La.10/9/98), 720 So.2d 667. In all other respects the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Birtha v. State, 824 So. 2d 1179, 2002 La. LEXIS 2615, 2002 WL 31081821 (La. 2002).

824 So. 2d 1179 (State ex rel. Birtha v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Broce
488 U.S. 563 (Supreme Court, 1989)
State Ex Rel. Boyd v. State
720 So. 2d 667 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1998)
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Butler
558 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)
State v. Arnold
816 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)