State ex rel. Bingham v. Riley
This text of 217 N.E.2d 874 (State ex rel. Bingham v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition states unequivocally that the decision of the State Personnel Board of Review directed the respondent to restore the relators to their positions retroactive to the date of termination; that respondent has failed to comply with that decision; and that the respondent did not appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing the appeal from the board. There being no timely appeal from the decision of the board or from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, the matter is res judicata. Neither the decision of the board nor the judgment of the court is subject to collateral attack.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer and allow the writ. State, ex rel. Jones, v. Ward, Dir., 177 Ohio St. 89.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 N.E.2d 874, 6 Ohio St. 2d 263, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 424, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bingham-v-riley-ohio-1966.