State ex rel. Billings v. City of Port Townsend

67 P. 1135, 27 Wash. 728, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 448
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 8, 1902·No. No. 4189·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment was rendered in the superior court for Jefferson county on October 25, 1901, against the appellant and his surety, the United States Guaranty Company. An appeal was [729]*729taken from such judgment, which appeal was not joined in by the surety, and no notice of appeal was served upon the surety. Motion is made by the respondents to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that this court has no jurisdiction thereof, nor of the subject-matter thereof, nor of the persons of said respondents. Under the rule announced in Cline v. Mitchell, 1 Wash. 24 (23 Pac. 1013), and Carstens v. Gustin, 18 Wash. 90 (50 Pac. 933), the motion will be sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Billings v. City of Port Townsend, 67 P. 1135, 27 Wash. 728, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 448 (Wash. 1902).

67 P. 1135 (State ex rel. Billings v. City of Port Townsend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deno v. Standard Furniture Co.
66 P.2d 1158 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Shippen v. Shippen
158 P. 247 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Long Bell Lumber Co. v. Gaston
139 P. 641 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
Evans v. Cheyenne Cement Stone & Brick Co.
122 P. 588 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1912)
O'Connor v. Lighthizer
75 P. 643 (Washington Supreme Court, 1904)
Pierce v. Commercial Investment Co.
72 P. 473 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)