State ex rel. Billings Education Ass'n v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone

531 P.2d 685, 166 Mont. 1, 1974 Mont. LEXIS 379, 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3377
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 26, 1974
DocketNo. 12836
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 531 P.2d 685 (State ex rel. Billings Education Ass'n v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Billings Education Ass'n v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Yellowstone, 531 P.2d 685, 166 Mont. 1, 1974 Mont. LEXIS 379, 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3377 (Mo. 1974).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Relator here made application for an appropriate writ seeking to set aside an order of the district court of the Thirteenth judicial district, the Honorable B. W. Thomas, presiding, wherein that court denied an application for an injunction. The injunction sought below was to prevent the school board of Billings School District No. 2 of Yellowstone County from issuing individual teacher contracts after the relator and the school board failed to reach agreement on a master professional agreement.

Under the terms of section 75-6116, R.C.M.1947, it is. [3]*3clear that the school board has final authority. The relator’s contention is that reaching a master agreement is mandatory under the Professional Negotiations Act for Teachers (section 75-6115 through 75-6128, R.C.M.1947) and acts as a condition precedent to the issuance of individual teacher contracts. We do not agree.

After studying the record, briefs, and hearing oral argument, this Court declines to take jurisdiction of this application for extraordinary relief. The Professional Negotiations Act for Teachers does not require a board of trustees to reach a settlement, it only requires a good faith effort and the trial court found that such an effort was made. The final decision rests with the board as Article X, Section 8 of the Constitution of Montana, adopted in 1972 requires.

Accordingly the application is denied.

The foregoing order per curiam is concurred in by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON and MR. JUSTICE CASTLES and the HONORABLE ROBERT BOYD, District Judge, sitting for MR. JUSTICE DALY. The views of MR. JUSTICE JOHN C. HARRISON and the HONORABLE GORDON BENNETT, District Judge, sitting for MR. JUSTICE HAS WELL are not available at this writing; but because of the opening dates of school this order is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Hillard
Montana Supreme Court, 1982
Hillard v. Jenkins
Montana Supreme Court, 1982
Pinion v. H.C. Smith Construction C
Montana Supreme Court, 1980
State v. Burlingame
Montana Supreme Court, 1979

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 P.2d 685, 166 Mont. 1, 1974 Mont. LEXIS 379, 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-billings-education-assn-v-district-court-of-the-thirteenth-mont-1974.