State Ex Rel. Better Built Homes & Mortgage Co. v. McKelvey

256 S.W. 495, 301 Mo. 130, 1923 Mo. LEXIS 119
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 20, 1923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

*131 WALKER, J.

This case, as in City of St. Louis v. Evraiff et al. and State ex rel. Penrose Investment Co. v. McKelvey, Building Commissioner, involves the question as to the validity of Ordinance No. 30199 of the city of St. Louis, designated as the Zoning Ordinance. In those cases we held the ordinance to he invalid as not constituting an authorized exercise of the police power. The issue here being the same as in those cases a like conclusion must follow.

Our peremptory writ should therefore issue and it is so ordered.

Woodson, G. J., and David E. Blair, J., concur; Graves, J., concurs in the result; James T. Blair, Ragland, and White, JJ., dissent for reasons expressed by White, J., in Penrose Case, 301 Mo. 1; Graves, J., concurs in separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Better Built Homes & Mortgage Co. v. McKelvey, 256 S.W. 495, 301 Mo. 130, 1923 Mo. LEXIS 119 (Mo. 1923).

256 S.W. 495 (State Ex Rel. Better Built Homes & Mortgage Co. v. McKelvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kroner v. City of Portland
240 P. 536 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)
Inspector of Buildings v. Stoklosa
145 N.E. 262 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)