State ex rel. Bessinger v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Bessinger v. Johnson

98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 14, 1918

DocketNo. 15953

StatusPublished

This text of 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450 (State ex rel. Bessinger v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bessinger v. Johnson, 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450 (Ohio 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the court of appeals of Lucas county refusing to issue a writ of prohibition directed to the common pleas court of Lucas county, be, and the same hereby is affirmed, for the reason that the court of common pleas has full and complete jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action pending before it, and full authority under the laws of this state to determine its own jurisdiction.

This court further find, that the issues and evidence in this case are identical with the issues and evidence in the case of State, ex rel. George Barnes, v. Curtis T. Johnson, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County, No. 15908, [ante, 438], in which cause this court finally and fully ad-' judicated all"the issues and questions presented by the record in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the court of appeals of Lucas county refusing to issue a writ of prohibition directed to the common pleas court of Lucas county, be, and the same hereby is affirmed, for the reason that the court of common pleas has full and complete jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action pending before it, and full authority under the laws of this state to determine its own jurisdiction.

This court further find, that the issues and evidence in this case are identical with the issues and evidence in the case of State, ex rel. George Barnes, v. Curtis T. Johnson, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County, No. 15908, [ante, 438], in which cause this court finally and fully ad-' judicated all"the issues and questions presented by the record in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bessinger-v-johnson-ohio-1918.