State ex rel. Berg v. Village Council

120 N.W. 894, 107 Minn. 441, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 583
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 16, 1909·No. Nos. 15,839—(40)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ELLIOTT, J.

The village council of the village of Blackduck, after notice and a hearing, revoked a liquor license held by the relator, Berg. On the application of Berg, what the appellant calls a writ of certiorari issued out of the district court for the purpose of bringing up the record for review. After a hearing the court quashed the so-called writ, and Berg appealed to this court.

No proper writ of certiorari was issued. What passed by that name in the proceedings was no more than a subpoena duces tecum. It was directed to certain individuals by name, who were described as the president and the recorder, respectively, of the village. The writ should have been directed to the common council of the village of Blackduck, and commanded it to make return of its proceedings in the matter of the revocation of the license. See Dunnell, Pr. § 864?.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Berg v. Village Council, 120 N.W. 894, 107 Minn. 441, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 583 (Mich. 1909).

120 N.W. 894 (State ex rel. Berg v. Village Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ram Development Co. v. Shaw
244 N.W.2d 110 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1976)
State Ex Rel. Gardner v. Hall
221 S.W. 708 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)