State ex rel. Bensman v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Bensman v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections

917 N.E.2d 816, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1514

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 8, 2009

Docket2009-2035

StatusPublished

This text of 917 N.E.2d 816 (State ex rel. Bensman v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bensman v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections, 917 N.E.2d 816, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1514 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-08-1211. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. On December 3, 2009, appellant filed a memorandum opposing appellee’s motion to dismiss. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4XB), the memorandum opposing the motion to dismiss was due no later than November 30, 2009. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(D) prohibits untimely filings,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s memorandum opposing the motion to dismiss is stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-08-1211. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. On December 3, 2009, appellant filed a memorandum opposing appellee’s motion to dismiss. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4XB), the memorandum opposing the motion to dismiss was due no later than November 30, 2009. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(D) prohibits untimely filings,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s memorandum opposing the motion to dismiss is stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

917 N.E.2d 816, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bensman-v-lucas-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2009.