State ex rel. Bennett v. Indust Comm
This text of 19 Ohio Law. Abs. 1 (State ex rel. Bennett v. Indust Comm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The motion to quash the service of summons will be overruled. It is established that an objection to the jurisdiction of the court of the subject matter or a motion to dismiss a suit or proceeding upon ahy other grounds than the court’s jurisdiction over the person, operates as a general entry of appearance. Handy v Insurance Co., 37 Oh St, 366. Smith v Hoover, 39 Oh St, 249, at 257. Elliott v Lawhead, 43 Oh St, 171. Klein v Lust, 110 Oh St, 197.
The Commission, therefore, having by the motion entered its appearance in the case, the motion will be overruled. Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Ohio Law. Abs. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bennett-v-indust-comm-ohioctapp-1935.