State ex rel. Bemis

459 So. 2d 1227, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10035
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 20, 1984
DocketNo. 84 KJ 1044
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 459 So. 2d 1227 (State ex rel. Bemis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Bemis, 459 So. 2d 1227, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10035 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

CARTER, Judge:

This Court, ex proprio motu, issued an order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed since the judgment is one refusing to modify a juvenile judgment of disposition and as such is not appealable.

A petition was filed charging Brian Eugene Bémis (then 15 years of age) with aggravated burglary, theft of $17.00 cash, and aggravated rape in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:60, 67, and 42, respectively. The juvenile admitted to the aggravated rape offense and the charges on the other two offenses were dismissed without prejudice. Subsequently, the juvenile was adjudicated a delinquent and a judgment of disposition was rendered in October of 1981, ordering that the juvenile be committed to the custody of the Louisiana Department of Corrections until his twenty-first birthday.

In April of 1984, the juvenile filed a petition for modification of judgment of disposition. This request was summarily denied and the juvenile has perfected this appeal to this court for review of the summary denial of his request to modify the judgment of disposition.

Only a judgment of disposition is appeal-able in juvenile cases. LSA-C.J.P. art. 97. What constitutes a judgment of disposition is set forth in LSA-C.J.P. art. 87. The denial of a motion to modify a judgment of disposition is not a judgment of disposition, and this court has no appellate jurisdiction to review it. This appeal must therefore be dismissed. This matter may be considered under our supervisory jurisdiction on a proper application. LSA-Const. Art. V, § 10(A); LSA-C.J.P. art. 105.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Nh
11 So. 3d 27 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
State ex rel. N. H.
11 So. 3d 27 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 So. 2d 1227, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bemis-lactapp-1984.