State ex rel. Belonzja v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Belonzja v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District

258 P.2d 749, 127 Mont. 609, 1953 Mont. LEXIS 51

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 2, 1953

DocketNo. 9247

StatusPublished

This text of 258 P.2d 749 (State ex rel. Belonzja v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Belonzja v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District, 258 P.2d 749, 127 Mont. 609, 1953 Mont. LEXIS 51 (Mo. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an original proceeding here commenced by Pete Bellonzja, an inmate of the State Prison who was there committed by the district court of Cascade County after having pleaded guilty to an information therein filed, charging him with robbery. He here complains, that said district court committed error in denying a petition for a writ of coram nobis which he had filed attempting to show that at the time of entering his plea he was suffering from “epilepsy illness” which afflicted him two or three times daily and which required medical treatment, and that the medical treatment supplied him while in the Cascade County jail awaiting arraignment consisted of [610]*610narcotic pills which left him devoid of will power and the capacity to reason.

We cannot find from the showing here made that the district court committed error in denying relator’s petition and accordingly this proceeding is ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an original proceeding here commenced by Pete Bellonzja, an inmate of the State Prison who was there committed by the district court of Cascade County after having pleaded guilty to an information therein filed, charging him with robbery. He here complains, that said district court committed error in denying a petition for a writ of coram nobis which he had filed attempting to show that at the time of entering his plea he was suffering from “epilepsy illness” which afflicted him two or three times daily and which required medical treatment, and that the medical treatment supplied him while in the Cascade County jail awaiting arraignment consisted of [610]*610narcotic pills which left him devoid of will power and the capacity to reason.

We cannot find from the showing here made that the district court committed error in denying relator’s petition and accordingly this proceeding is ordered dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 P.2d 749, 127 Mont. 609, 1953 Mont. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-belonzja-v-district-court-of-eighth-judicial-district-mont-1953.