State ex rel. Bell v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

781 N.E.2d 1016, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1406
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 2003
Docket2002-1527
StatusPublished

This text of 781 N.E.2d 1016 (State ex rel. Bell v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Bell v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 781 N.E.2d 1016, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On return to regular docket and respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings.

IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and that the cause be, and hereby is, DISMISSED.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 N.E.2d 1016, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bell-v-montgomery-cty-bd-of-commrs-ohio-2003.