State ex rel. Bell v. Marion Cty. Pros. Atty.

777 N.E.2d 267, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1410
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 23, 2002
Docket2002-1451
StatusPublished

This text of 777 N.E.2d 267 (State ex rel. Bell v. Marion Cty. Pros. Atty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Bell v. Marion Cty. Pros. Atty., 777 N.E.2d 267, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C. J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 N.E.2d 267, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bell-v-marion-cty-pros-atty-ohio-2002.