State ex rel. Beer v. Thayer
64 N.W. 700, 46 Neb. 137, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 457
Opinion
The controlling facts in this case are the same as in State v. McPeak, 31 Neb., 139, and following the decision [138]*138therein, a peremptory writ of mandamus will issue as prayed.
Writ allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Beer v. Thayer, 64 N.W. 700, 46 Neb. 137, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 457 (Neb. 1895).
64 N.W. 700 (State ex rel. Beer v. Thayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patteson v. Johnson
367 N.W.2d 123 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
State, Board of Educational Lands & Funds v. Bardsley
177 N.W.2d 599 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1970)
Pfeifer v. Ableidinger
89 N.W.2d 568 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1958)
Todd v. Board of Educational Lands and Funds
48 N.W.2d 706 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1951)
Stanser v. Cather
123 N.W. 316 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1909)
State ex rel. Patterson v. Wenzel
75 N.W. 579 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)