State ex rel. Beauregard v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Beauregard v. Indus. Comm.

1999 Ohio 183, 86 Ohio St. 3d 577

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1999

Docket1998-2409

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 183 (State ex rel. Beauregard v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Beauregard v. Indus. Comm., 1999 Ohio 183, 86 Ohio St. 3d 577 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 577.]

THE STATE EX REL. BEAUREGARD, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Beauregard v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-183.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2409—Submitted July 28, 1999—Decided September 22, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD07-949. __________________ Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., and William R. Menacher, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Mark S. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the judgment entry of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 577.]

THE STATE EX REL. BEAUREGARD, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Beauregard v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-183.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2409—Submitted July 28, 1999—Decided September 22, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD07-949. __________________ Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., and William R. Menacher, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Mark S. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the judgment entry of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 183, 86 Ohio St. 3d 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-beauregard-v-indus-comm-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack