State ex rel. Beal v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 141.]
THE STATE EX REL. BEAL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Beal v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-141.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-75—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD10-1267. __________________ Gloria P. Castrodale, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Hanlon, Duff, Paleudis & Estadt Co., L.P.A., and John G. Paleudis, for appellee Consolidation Coal Co. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and order relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1998 Ohio 141 (State ex rel. Beal v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.