State Ex Rel. B.E.A. v. District Co

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 26, 1975
Docket12836
StatusPublished

This text of State Ex Rel. B.E.A. v. District Co (State Ex Rel. B.E.A. v. District Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. B.E.A. v. District Co, (Mo. 1975).

Opinion

No. 12836

I N T E SUPREME C U T OF THE STATE OF M N A A H OR OTN

STATE EX REL BILLINGS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, I N C , , a n o n - p r o f i t Montana c o r p o r a t i o n ,

P l a i n t i f f and R e l a t o r ,

T E DISTRICT COURT O THE THIRTEENTH J U D I C I A L H F DISTRICT O THE STATE O M N A A i n and f o r t h e F F OTN, County of Yellowstone, and t h e HON. B , W. THOMAS, p r e s i d i n g D i s t r i c t Judge,

Defendants and Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING:

Counsel of Record:

For R e l a t o r :

Pedersen, Herndon and Harper, B i l l i n g s , Montana Donald R. Herndon argued, B i l l i n g s , Montana

For Respondent:

Moulton, Bellingham, Longo and Mather, B i l l i n g s , Montana William Bellingham argued, B i l l i n g s , Montana

Submitted: August 19, 1974

Decided: August 26, 1974 -. ,- Filed : 3 JE i S' ',9/4 Dissent Filed: December 12, 1974 Hon. Gordon R . B e n n e t t , D i s t r i c t J u d g e , s i t t i n g i n p l a c e of Mr. J u s t i c e Frank I . Haswell, d i s s e n t i n g :

I c a n n o t concur e n t i r e l y w i t h t h e o r d e r of t h e m a j o r i t y

o r t h e r e a s o n i n g behind t h e o r d e r b e c a u s e it d e n i e s a l l e f f e c t t o

t h e " P r o f e s s i o n a l N e g o t i a t i o n s Act f o r T e a c h e r s " , s e c t i o n s 75-

6115 t h r o u g h 75-6128, Revised Codes of Montana, 1947, h e r e i n a f t e r

r e f e r r e d t o a s " t h e Act". I t must be presumed t h a t t h e L e g i s -

l a t u r e i n t e n d e d t h e Act t o make a t l e a s t some s u b s t a n t i v e changes

i n t h e e x i s t i n g law i n o r d e r t o a c c o m p l i s h t h e L e g i s l a t i v e dec-

l a r a t i o n of p o l i c y and p u r p o s e e x p r e s s e d i n s e c t i o n 75-6116, R.C.M.

1947. I n h o l d i n g t h a t t h e board of e d u c a t i o n h a s " f i n a l a u t h o r i t y " a s t o negotiations with i t s teachers t h e majority has stripped t h e

Act of i t s meaning and r e t u r n e d t h e p a r t i e s t o t h e i r former p o s i -

t i o n s a s i f t h e Act had n e v e r been p a s s e d . S t a t u t e s of t h i s s t a t e

a r e t o be c o n s t r u e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e l e g i s l a t i v e i n t e n t . Courts

may o n l y a s c e r t a i n and d e c l a r e what i s c o n t a i n e d i n s t a t u t e s and must g i v e e f f e c t t o e v e r y p r o v i s i o n i f p o s s i b l e .

The Act e x p r e s s l y made major changes i n t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between t e a c h e r s and t h e i r employing s c h o o l b o a r d s . For t h e f i r s t

t i m e i n t h e h i s t o r y of t h i s s t a t e , t e a c h e r s were g i v e n t h e r i g h t

t o b a r g a i n c o l l e c t i v e l y a s t o n e g o t i a b l e c o n d i t i o n s of employment

t h r o u g h r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s of t h e i r c h o i c e who f u n c t i o n a s t h e s o l e

representatives f o r a l l teachers i n the 'appropriate u n i t " . Direct

n e g o t i a t i o n s between r e p r e s e n t e d i n d i v i d u a l t e a c h e r s and t h e i r

employer a r e p r o h i b i t e d . Both t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of t h e t e a c h e r s and t h e s c h o o l board have a duty t o n e g o t i a t e and b a r g a i n . The

i n t e n d e d r e s u l t of t h e n e g o t i a t i o n s i s t o a r r i v e a t a m a s t e r a g r e e - ment which must be reduced t o w r i t i n g and r a t i f i e d . A l l individual

t e a c h e r c o n t r a c t s must conform t o t h e master agreement. It i s an

u n f a i r l a b o r p r a c t i c e f o r employing b o a r d s of e d u c a t i o n t o i n t e r f e r e with, r e s t r a i n o r coerce teachers i n t h e i r r i g h t of self-organ-

i z a t i o n o r s e l e c t i o n of a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , o r t o r e f u s e t o n e g o t i a t e

i n good f a i t h . D i s t r i c t c o u r t s of t h i s s t a t e a r e g r a n t e d j u r i s -

d i c t i o n t o e n j o i n u n f a i r l a b o r p r a c t i c e s a s defined i n t h e Act.

I cannot construe t h e foregoing provisions a s giving

b o a r d s of e d u c a t i o n " f i n a l a u t h o r i t y " . These s e c t i o n s e x p r e s s l y

g r a n t t e a c h e r s of t h i s s t a t e a d d i t i o n a l l e g a l r i g h t s n o t p r e v i o u s l y

r e c o g n i z e d by s t a t u t e and t o t h e e x t e n t g r a n t e d t h e a u t h o r i t y of b o a r d s of e d u c a t i o n i s d i m i n i s h e d .

The Act r e q u i r e s good f a i t h c o l l e c t i v e b a r g a i n i n g . Good

f a i t h b a r g a i n i n g c a n o n l y o c c u r between r e l a t i v e e q u a l s and i s

i n h e r e n t l y impossible i f e i t h e r s i d e has " f i n a l a u t h o r i t y " . The

Act d o e s n o t r e q u i r e agreement. What i s r e q u i r e d i s c o n t i n u e d

good f a i t h n e g o t i a t i o n s between t h e p a r t i e s u n t i l a m a s t e r a g r e e -

ment i s a g r e e d upon.

The r e l a t o r t e a c h e r s i n t h i s p r o c e e d i n g a r e a t t e m p t i n g t o

e n j o i n t h e s c h o o l board from i s s u i n g i n d i v i d u a l t e a c h e r c o n t r a c t s

b e f o r e a m a s t e r agreement h a s been n e g o t i a t e d and r a t i f i e d by t h e

parties. I f such i s s u a n c e of i n d i v i d u a l t e a c h e r c o n t r a c t s con-

s t i t u t e s a n u n f a i r l a b o r p r a c t i c e w i t h i n t h e meaning of s e c t i o n

75-6120, R.C.M. 1947, i t may be e n j o i n e d . This i s t h e s o l e i s s u e b e f o r e t h e Court and b o t h p a r t i e s a g r e e t h a t t h e u n r e s o l v e d i s s u e s

p r e v e n t i n g agreement a r e n o t r e l e v a n t t o t h i s q u e s t i o n . There i s

a l s o no d i s p u t e c o n c e r n i n g t h e f a c t t h a t t h e s c h o o l board i s

a t t e m p t i n g t o r e q u i r e t e a c h e r a c c e p t a n c e of i n d i v i d u a l c o n t r a c t s

w i t h i n a s p e c i f i e d p e r i o d of t i m e a t t h e p e n a l t y of f o r f e i t u r e of the teacher's position. S e c t i o n 75-6102, R.C.M. 1947, r e q u i r e s w r i t t e n i n d i v i d u a l

teacher contracts. S e c t i o n 75-6122, R.C.M. 1947, r e q u i r e s m a s t e r agreements t o be reduced t o w r i t i n g and r a t i f i e d . N statute o

d i r e c t l y p r o v i d e s t h a t e i t h e r t y p e of c o n t r a c t s h o u l d p r e c e d e t h e other. I t i s t h e d u t y of t h i s Court t o p r o v i d e a c o n s t r u c t i o n

which g i v e s b o t h p r o v i s i o n s e f f e c t , i f p o s s i b l e , c o n s i s t e n t

with t h e expressed l e g i s l a t i v e i n t e n t .

Individual c o n t r a c t s p r i o r t o r a t i f i c a t i o n of a master

agreement s e r v e no u s e f u l o r l e g i t i m a t e p u r p o s e . The o f f e r and

a c c e p t a n c e f u n c t i o n s of c o n t r a c t i n g i s now accomplished by " n o t i c e s

o f r e - e l e c t i o n " of t e n u r e t e a c h e r s p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 75-6105,

R.C.M. 1947, and of n o n t e n u r e t e a c h e r s p u r s u a n t t o s e c t i o n 75-6105.1,

R.C.M. 1947. Both s e c t i o n s r e q u i r e t h e t e a c h e r t o a c c e p t t h e " r e -

e l e c t i o n " i n w r i t i n g within 2 0 days o r f o r f e i t t h e p o s i t i o n . By

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Skaggs Drug Center, Inc.
359 P.2d 644 (Montana Supreme Court, 1961)
Yellowstone Bank v. State Board of Equalization
351 P.2d 904 (Montana Supreme Court, 1960)
Willett v. State Board of Examiners
115 P.2d 287 (Montana Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Ex Rel. B.E.A. v. District Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bea-v-district-co-mont-1975.