State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. v. Davis

858 N.E.2d 822, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1412

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 2006

Docket2006-2173

StatusPublished

This text of 858 N.E.2d 822 (State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. v. Davis, 858 N.E.2d 822, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-060760. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellants Medco’s and Merck’s motion to consolidate 2006-2006, State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis, 2006-2169, Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2006-2170, Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2006-2171, Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2006-2172, State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis, and 2006-2173, State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted in part, and 2006-2006, 2006-2172, and 2006-2173 are consolidated.

It is further ordered that the parties shall combine the briefing of 2006-2006, 2006-2172, and 2006-2173 and file one brief for each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; the parties shall file an original brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-060760. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellants Medco’s and Merck’s motion to consolidate 2006-2006, State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis, 2006-2169, Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2006-2170, Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2006-2171, Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2006-2172, State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis, and 2006-2173, State ex rel. Bd. of State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio v. Davis,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted in part, and 2006-2006, 2006-2172, and 2006-2173 are consolidated.

It is further ordered that the parties shall combine the briefing of 2006-2006, 2006-2172, and 2006-2173 and file one brief for each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; the parties shall file an original brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

858 N.E.2d 822, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bd-of-state-teachers-retirement-sys-v-davis-ohio-2006.