State ex rel. Baumgardner v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections
This text of 736 N.E.2d 474 (State ex rel. Baumgardner v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election case. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed a brief and evidence, due September 28, 2000, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 N.E.2d 474, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-baumgardner-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2000.