State ex rel. Baumgardner v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

736 N.E.2d 474, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2543
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 6, 2000
Docket00-1646
StatusPublished

This text of 736 N.E.2d 474 (State ex rel. Baumgardner v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Baumgardner v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 736 N.E.2d 474, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2543 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election case. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed a brief and evidence, due September 28, 2000, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 474, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-baumgardner-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2000.