State Ex Rel. Bauer v. Director of Agriculture

186 N.E. 92, 125 Ohio St. 637, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 637, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 271
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 25, 1932
Docket23487
StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.E. 92 (State Ex Rel. Bauer v. Director of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Bauer v. Director of Agriculture, 186 N.E. 92, 125 Ohio St. 637, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 637, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 271 (Ohio 1932).

Opinion

It is found that the cause was an original suit in the Court of Appeals, heard on the pleadings and evidence and decided upon questions of fact. It further appearing that no bill of exceptions was allowed in the Court of Appeals, and this Court being of opinion that the errors complained of are not properly presented without a bill of exceptions, it is ordered that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.E. 92, 125 Ohio St. 637, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 637, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bauer-v-director-of-agriculture-ohio-1932.