State Ex Rel. Bates v. Board of County Commissioners

79 S.E. 309, 95 S.C. 463, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 249
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 24, 1913
Docket8653
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 S.E. 309 (State Ex Rel. Bates v. Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Bates v. Board of County Commissioners, 79 S.E. 309, 95 S.C. 463, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 249 (S.C. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is a proceeding in the original jurisdiction of this Court to enjoin the county authorities of Richland county from using the chain gang of Richland county in the construction of a highway within what was formerly the town of Shandon, now a part of the city of Columbia.

There are several questions involved in the hearing on the merits, but one is sufficient for the purposes of this motion.

It is conceded by the county authorities that the road is being built under contractors. The county is to prepare the road for a top covering of bitulithic covering and the bitulithic covering is to be put on by the employees of the contractors. It is further conceded that the chain gang is kept only from a half to a block in advance of the contractors’ employees.

The Code of 1912, -section 957, contains this proviso: “Provided that said chain gang shall not be worked in connection with or near any road contractor or overseer.”

The Century Dictionary defines “connection:”

1. “The state of being connected or joined; union by junction, by an intervening substance or medium, by dependence or relation or by order in a series.”

Where one is laying the substructure and the other the superstructure, the parties are working in connection with each other. On the face of the statute it appears to be for *465 bidden. The effect of the several statutes on each other can not be settled until the exact status of the Codes under the Constitution is determined. That question is now before the Supreme Court and ought not to be decided by one member. On the face of this statute, the collaboration of the chain gang and the employers of a contractor is forbidden, and the respondents ought not to proceed in this way until the question can be heard by the full Court.

It is, therefore, ordered, that the respondents be, and they are hereby enjoined from using the chain gang in connection with the employees of the contractors in the building and 'construction of the road mentioned in the petition herein, until the hearing of the proceeding in open Court and the determination thereof by its judgment herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.
312 S.E.2d 556 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.E. 309, 95 S.C. 463, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bates-v-board-of-county-commissioners-sc-1913.