State ex rel. Barze v. State
This text of 684 So. 2d 409 (State ex rel. Barze v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Barze, James; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 61471; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. K294 1493.
Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether counsel’s joint representation of relator and co-perpetrator who pled guilty and then testified against relator at trial constituted an actual conflict of interest adversely affecting counsel’s performance. Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980); State v. Ross, 410 So.2d 1388, 1390 (La.1982); State v. Rowe, 416 So.2d 87, 91 (La.1982). In all other respects, the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 So. 2d 409, 1996 La. LEXIS 3447, 1996 WL 707483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-barze-v-state-la-1996.