State ex rel. Barton v. Barton

26 N.E.3d 821, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1485

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 2015·No. 2014-2241·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motions to dismiss. Motions granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Barton v. Barton, 26 N.E.3d 821, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1485 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

26 N.E.3d 821 (State ex rel. Barton v. Barton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.