State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. Milledge
25 So. 2d 195, 157 Fla. 146, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 683
Opinions
Upon consideration of the petition for prohibition, the brief filed by counsel for the petitioners, and the arguments offered by Mr. Whitaker, representing the petitioners, and Mr. Wilcox, representing amicus curiae, the Bar Association of Dade County, and the court being advised in the premises, it is ordéred that the petition for prohibition be denied and that the rule nisi issued herein 1 March 1946 be discharged, and the supersedeas previously issued is hereby vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. Milledge, 25 So. 2d 195, 157 Fla. 146, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 683 (Fla. 1946).
25 So. 2d 195 (State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. Milledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee v. State
155 So. 123 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Parks
194 So. 613 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
State Ex Rel. La Russa v. Himes
197 So. 762 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Dewell
179 So. 695 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Oakley v. . Aspinwall
3 N.Y. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1850)
Crook v. Newborg & Son
124 Ala. 479 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)