State ex rel. Barr v. Deckebach

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Barr v. Deckebach

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 643

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 1922·No. No. 17487·Published

Opinion

The court finds on the authority of State, ex rel., v. Robins, 71 Ohio St., 273, that the ordinance which requires the filing of the bond of a surety company for the purposes stated is invalid, and, therefore, overrules the demurrer of the defendant. And the defendant not desiring to plead further it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the writ prayed for in the petition be issued out of this court by the clerk thereof commanding the issuance of the license prayed for.

Writ allowed.

Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court finds on the authority of State, ex rel., v. Robins, 71 Ohio St., 273, that the ordinance which requires the filing of the bond of a surety company for the purposes stated is invalid, and, therefore, overrules the demurrer of the defendant. And the defendant not desiring to plead further it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the writ prayed for in the petition be issued out of this court by the clerk thereof commanding the issuance of the license prayed for.

Writ allowed.

Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Barr v. Deckebach, 105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 643 (Ohio 1922).

Pincite

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 643 (State ex rel. Barr v. Deckebach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.