State ex rel. Barnes v. Cleveland
892 N.E.2d 918, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1428
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and respondents’ motions for a more definite statement and to strike the amended complaint,
It is ordered by the court that relator’s motion for leave is denied and respondents’ motions are denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Barnes v. Cleveland, 892 N.E.2d 918, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1428 (Ohio 2008).
892 N.E.2d 918 (State ex rel. Barnes v. Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.