State ex rel. Barksdale v. Sutula

23 N.E.3d 1192, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1449
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 2015·No. 2014-1868·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On motions for judgment and damages and for sanctions or default. Motions denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Barksdale v. Sutula, 23 N.E.3d 1192, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2015).

23 N.E.3d 1192 (State ex rel. Barksdale v. Sutula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.