State ex rel. Barksdale v. Sutula

937 N.E.2d 1032, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1440
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 1, 2010
Docket2010-1490
StatusPublished

This text of 937 N.E.2d 1032 (State ex rel. Barksdale v. Sutula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Barksdale v. Sutula, 937 N.E.2d 1032, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1440 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

In Procedendo. Motion for default judgment denied. Motions to dismiss granted. Relator’s motions to disqualify and for relief denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 N.E.2d 1032, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-barksdale-v-sutula-ohio-2010.