State ex rel. Barker v. Humphrey

218 N.C. 389
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 30, 1940·Published

Opinion

PeR Cueiam.

The proceedings in the court below on the motion filed is in substantial accord with the opinion of this Court rendered in Humphrey v. Churchill, Sheriff, 217 N. C., 530. Even if it be conceded that the trial judge had the power to find the facts on the motion filed he had the authority to call a jury to his aid and to submit the issue of fact to the jury for determination.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Barker v. Humphrey, 218 N.C. 389 (N.C. 1940).

218 N.C. 389 (State ex rel. Barker v. Humphrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Humphrey v. . Churchill, Sheriff
8 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)