State Ex Rel. Barber v. Daues

6 S.W.2d 898, 319 Mo. 743
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 9, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BLAIR, J.

— Certiorari to the St. Louis Court of Appeals. . It is sought to quash the opinion of respondents in the case of Berno C. Barber v. American Car & Foundry Company, decided by respondents, July 5, 1927, because of alleged conflict between said opinion and controlling decisions of this court.

The same questions are involved in this case as were involved in the companion case of State ex rel. Hopkins v. Daues, ante, page 733, this day decided.

The conclusions reached by us in that casé require us to quash the opinion of respondents in this case. It is so ordered.

All concur, except Graves, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Barber v. Daues, 6 S.W.2d 898, 319 Mo. 743 (Mo. 1928).

6 S.W.2d 898 (State Ex Rel. Barber v. Daues) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2025
Hall v. Brookshire
267 S.W.2d 627 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1954)
State v. Williams
71 S.W.2d 732 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1934)
State v. Clough
38 S.W.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1931)