Home/Washington Supreme Court/State Ex Rel. Bannick v. Pierce

State Ex Rel. Bannick v. Pierce

28 P.2d 110, 175 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 988
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 23, 1933
DocketNo. 24730. Department One.
StatusPublished

This text of 28 P.2d 110 (State Ex Rel. Bannick v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Bannick v. Pierce, 28 P.2d 110, 175 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 988 (Wash. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.—

The petition of Claude G. Bannick, sheriff for King county, to the superior court for King county, for a writ of prohibition to prevent Clarence W. Pierce, a justice of the peace for Morningside precinct, King county, from holding the petitioner in contempt of court, was granted. The justice of the peace has appealed.

This is a companion case to that of State ex rel. Maslan v. Pierce, ante p. 676, 28 P. (2d) 109, just decided, and, upon the authority of that case, the order from which the appeal is prosecuted is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Maslan v. Pierce
28 P.2d 109 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 P.2d 110, 175 Wash. 700, 1933 Wash. LEXIS 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bannick-v-pierce-wash-1933.