State ex rel. Ballett v. Gremillion

169 So. 2d 392, 247 La. 6
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 17, 1964·No. No. 47557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: Albert Ballett, Jr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Cal-casieu. 168 So.2d 270.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

McCALEB, J.,

thinks that a writ should be granted in view of the physicians’ testimony that relator is not criminally insane. The finding of the trial judge that relator is a menace to society is founded on evidence that he may be potentially a menace to society. If R.S. 15 :270 is thus construed, it is unconstitutional.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ballett v. Gremillion, 169 So. 2d 392, 247 La. 6 (La. 1964).

169 So. 2d 392 (State ex rel. Ballett v. Gremillion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madison v. Ward
825 So. 2d 1245 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)