State ex rel. Baldwin v. Hale

738 P.2d 1016, 86 Or. App. 361
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 8, 1987
DocketP79-131; CA A39979
StatusPublished

This text of 738 P.2d 1016 (State ex rel. Baldwin v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Baldwin v. Hale, 738 P.2d 1016, 86 Or. App. 361 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In 1981 in a filiation proceeding under ORS 109.124 et seq, the court entered an order establishing paternity and providing for child support to be paid by respondent. In February, 1986, respondent moved to set aside the order on the ground that it is void, because the original petition failed to establish jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. ORS 109.700 et seq. The trial court held that the act does not govern jurisdiction over filiation proceedings but set aside the support portion of the 1981 order and what it viewed as an award of custody to mother. We reverse.

The UCCJA applies to a “custody determination,” which it defines as “a court decision and court orders and instructions providing for the custody of a child, including visitation rights.” However, “ ‘custody determination’ does not include a decision relating to child support or any other monetary obligation of any person.” ORS 109.710(2); see ORS 109.730(1). The 1981 order did not award custody. Custody resulted by operation of law after paternity was established. ORS 109.175. Therefore, the trial court could not affect custody. The trial court also erred in setting aside the child support order. Determination of support, pursuant to ORS 109.155(4), was within the court’s authority.1

Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate the October 14, 1981, filiation and support order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. State of Pa. v. Stork
641 P.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
Overturf v. Lauzon
663 P.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 P.2d 1016, 86 Or. App. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-baldwin-v-hale-orctapp-1987.