State ex rel. Baker v. Tri-Rivers Educational Computer Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Baker v. Tri-Rivers Educational Computer Ass'n

883 N.E.2d 455, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1437

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 26, 2008·No. 2008-0152·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within ten days after filing of respondents’ brief.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within ten days after filing of respondents’ brief.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

State ex rel. Baker v. Tri-Rivers Educational Computer Ass'n, 883 N.E.2d 455, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

883 N.E.2d 455 (State ex rel. Baker v. Tri-Rivers Educational Computer Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.